trianta/rustlings
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
1,656 Commits 1 Branch 0 Tags
e3a20b8bc899eae9dfb440b885836812fa8614ee
Commit Graph

29 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nidhal Messaoudi e3a20b8bc8 Learning about vectors 2023-02-27 21:16:40 +01:00
mokou 2e62505143 feat(move_semantics): finish updating comments 2022-07-12 15:43:26 +02:00
mokou bb0cf92b8b feat(move_semantics): clarify some hints 2022-07-12 15:25:31 +02:00
mokou ed0f278a8f chore: remove mod.rs files and exercises feature 2022-07-11 12:53:49 +02:00
ragreenburg 89650f808a fix(move_semantics2): Add comment 2022-04-06 09:29:27 +02:00
Pascal Havé 4dfd85ff05 fix(move_semantics) : add move_semantics6.rs to its mod 2022-04-03 23:51:46 +02:00
Lucas Aries 3f0e1303e0 feat: Add move_semantics6.rs exercise (#908) 2022-03-29 15:02:35 +02:00
x-hgg-x 179a75a68d fix: Include exercises folder in the project structure behind a feature (#917) 
closes #859
closes #913
closes #942
 2022-03-29 11:44:06 +02:00
Fredrik Enestad 46c28d5cef fix(move_semantics5): correct typo (#857) 2021-09-30 10:18:36 +02:00
frogtd d75759e829 fix(move_semantics5): change &mut *y to &mut x (#814) 
Instead of having to explain why 
```rs
let mut x = 100; 
let y = &mut x;
let mut z_owned = *y;
let z = &mut z_owned;
*y += 100;
*z += 1000;
```
and 
```rs
let mut x = 100; 
let y = &mut x;
let z = &mut *y;
*y += 100;
*z += 1000;
```
are different, you still get the point across about having only one mutable reference.
As it stands, this exercise does too much (dereferencing and having only one mutable reference), and by doing so confuses people.

Example of someone being confused by this:
<https://discord.com/channels/273534239310479360/273541522815713281/872689531428692040>
 2021-09-25 10:52:18 +02:00
ana df25684cb7 fix(move_semantics5): Clarify instructions 2021-07-29 12:37:15 +02:00
Taylor Yu 1b85828548 fix: move_semantics5 hints 
Improve the hints for move_semantics5, as well as the explanatory
comments in the code.

Previously, it was not clear what possible changes were allowed.
It seems that reordering the statements might be the intended solution.
The previous comment about not "adding newlines" doesn't make sense,
so treating it as "adding new lines" makes it more clear.
 2021-05-22 22:09:58 -05:00
Sateesh 399ab328d8 feat: Add move_semantics5 exercise. (#746) 
* feat: Add move_semantics5 exercise.

* feat: Add option3 exercise

* Address review comments. Fix typos, sentence formatting.

* Remove unwanted newline.

* Address review comments: make comment inline, fix format in print.
 2021-05-17 14:10:40 +02:00
Zerotask 249ad44cc0 docs(exercises): updated all exercises readme files 
all exercises readme files now have a unified structure and a description
 2021-04-23 19:54:31 +02:00
Tal cc266d7d80 fix(move_semantics4): Remove redundant "instead" (#640) 2021-02-07 12:22:13 +01:00
Marius Ungureanu 10965920fb fix(move_semantics4): Small readbility improvement (#617) 
* Small readbility improvement move_semantics4 doc

* Remove `an` as it refers to the argument
 2021-01-06 10:12:33 +01:00
Roberto Vidal b565c4d3e7 fix: line numbers in several exercises and hints 
The introduction of `I AM NOT DONE` shifted the lines of all
exercises, which now need adjustment.
 2019-11-14 08:21:56 +01:00
marisa ec2d4bd3ee Merge branch 'master' into refactor-hints 2019-11-11 17:21:06 +01:00
marisa 9bdb0a12e4 feat: Refactor hint system 
Hints are now accessible using the CLI subcommand `rustlings hint
<exercise name`.

BREAKING CHANGE: This fundamentally changes the way people interact with exercises.
 2019-11-11 16:51:38 +01:00
Roberto Vidal 2cdd61294f feat: improve watch execution mode 
The `watch` command now requires user action to move to the next
exercise.

BREAKING CHANGE: this changes the behavior of `watch`.
 2019-11-11 16:23:35 +01:00
bors aaad60d07e Auto merge of #172 - miller-time:fix-book-links, r=komaeda 
chore: Fix a couple broken book links

While I was fixing these, I figured maybe it's good to just use a consistent URL for book links: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/

Is there a plan for what to do with this old 1.4.0 example that doesn't exist in the current version of the book? Perhaps at least include a disclaimer when recommending that folks check it out?

https://github.com/rust-lang/rustlings/blob/34e31232dfddde284a341c9609b33cd27d9d5724/exercises/threads/README.md#L1
 2019-06-23 10:31:50 +00:00
Russell Cousineau eb13c2b6af chore: Clean up some formatting in exercises 2019-06-11 07:14:43 -07:00
Russell Cousineau 63c133e4a3 chore: Fix a couple broken book links 2019-06-11 07:13:05 -07:00
Yvan Sraka a71bc62c29 Add errors to exercises that compile without user changes 2019-04-22 00:09:30 +02:00
zacanger c5a374fbf2 Fix permissions on source files 2019-03-23 14:19:42 -06:00
liv a49a22071a redo the section readmes 2019-01-23 21:02:06 +01:00
delet0r b0c9b33978 Changed Rust Book versions in links to 2018 
Forgot to add changes to last commit.
 2018-11-27 10:54:01 +01:00
delet0r 0973e60056 Created sub READMEs for CLI only version 
Sub READMEs contain the relevant resources from the main
README of the web version. All second edition Rust Book links
were updated to the 2018 edition.

Fixed to typos in main README.md.
 2018-11-26 16:43:42 +01:00
olivia f7846af7ac right let's try this one again 2018-11-09 20:31:14 +01:00